Management Styles Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Management Styles - Essay ExamplePenalties such as fines are imposed in the interdict style of focussing. These negative style managers dominate their subordinates by putting emphasis on the imposition of penalties and fines for sub bar performance such as being open fire or suspended from their presents jobs without pay, reprimand and even, in rare occasions, insults in front of their fellow workers.This style of management is very proper for some employees but whitethorn not be recommended for other employee types. The employee turnover will be higher than other management styles because the employees. This domineering management style results to lower job pleasure because the some employees will prefer to resign than to be insulted or reprimanded in front of their workers. This is the autocratic management style.On the opposite end, some managers use the dogmatic style of management. The managers will give better education benefits and offer rewards and even promotions for ex cellent and above par performances. This is the custodial management style.A third management power style occurs when there is a mixture of both the negative and positive style of management. ... imanding can be used and there is other situation, at work, when the positive style of giving rewards and bonuses will increase worker production outputs.Managements use of power to change organisational realities by getting others to do what they want do is further strengthened by the Protestant value-systems during the Protestant Reformation that it is a MORAL obligation to work in order to have salvation. This ethic was one of the sparks that kindled the factory working procedures in the 18th century. Therefore, man felt that is a normal for a superior to order the workers to perform legitimate assigned tasks that will contribute to the accomplishment of over-all go with goals and objectives Frederic W. Taylor (Waring, 1991) studied human behaviour ( Grandjean & Kroener, 1997) at wor k in his management science. He equates the organization as a cheap machine where the human workers, managers and supervisors are likened to its many parts or subdivisions. Each must coordinate and cooperate with each other for the dispassionate accomplishment of company goals. The human workers are treated just like cheap machine spare parts that can be replaced, transferred, mended and strengthened.Management has the power for the company to implement Frederic Taylors work procedures such that each task can be broken down into its smallest unit and the best person to do a particular proposition job should be selected so that there will more products manufactured in lesser time at a better quality standard for Frederic Taylor saw that the interaction of human characteristics, social environment, task and physical environment, capacity, speed, durability and cost contributes much to the speedy and quality accomplishment of company goals and objectives. Taylors method has change ma gnitude